|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Labour's Ken Livingstone has lost his bid to win a third term as London's mayor. His defeat to Tory challenger Boris Johnson was another dramatic moment in a career that has already seen its fair share of ups and downs. From public vilification as a "loony left" pariah within his own party, to elder statesman and Britain's most powerful directly-elected politician, Mr Livingstone has refused to be written off. | ||
|
Ken Livingstone: A long, colourful career dogged by controversy See also The defeat of Ken Livingstone after eight years as Mayor of London is a big moment with implications way beyond the capital. We might well look back on Boris Johnson's remarkable victory as the time when the tide turned against Labour and could not be turned back by the general election. As the Tories acknowledged, Ken did some good things for London. It was in their interests to do so (as that's what many Londoners felt) rather than portray Livingstone as all bad. In any case, the London Evening Standard did their dirty work for them. The demise of Livingstone is very bad news for Gordon Brown. Ken's team calculated that his ratings were normally about 10 points higher than Labour's. So how did he lose? A highly effective (and expensive) "get out the vote" operation by the Tories in the outer London boroughs made it virtually impossible for Ken to make up the ground in his inner London strongholds. Boris fought a clever and disciplined campaign. He grew up politically from the TV show joker, even if he was hazy on policy. It will be fascinating to see whether he can keep it up as Mayor, but those people expecting him to implode may be proved wrong (again). I suspect Labour's defeat in London is not so much a vote against Brown, Labour or even Ken personally, but a vote against incumbency, a "time for change" message. That should be what worries Brown most. When he took over from Tony Blair, he knew he needed to be "the change" that many people wanted. But Labour's dismal local election results show he has failed. After 11 years in power, it is very hard to look new. Boris provided a breath of fresh air in London, making Ken look a bit stale. David Cameron will look new at the general election (even though he'll be the longest-serving party leader) because Brown has been on the scene for so long. And what was the most brilliant piece ever of political marketing? New Labour. There are nearly three million adults and children in London who were not born when Ken Livingstone arrived on the political scene as the most celebrated local government leader since Joseph Chamberlain ran Birmingham in Victorian times. Before Gordon Brown was even an MP, and while David Cameron and Boris Johnson were Eton schoolboys, the man with the nasal south London twang had achieved the status of a household name as leader of the Greater London Council. It was a political career that began and ended in controversy. During the 1981 local elections, the London Labour Party was led by an ordinary municipal politician. As soon as Labour had control of the council, left-wing councillors tossed out their old leader, and installed Mr Livingstone, the ultra-left, attention-loving, newt-rearing son of working class Tories from one of the poorest parts of south London. It is not just the time spent in the public eye that makes Mr Livingstone unique – it is also the vitriol he has attracted from one quarter after another. When the office of Mayor of London was created in 2000, Tony Blair was determined that whoever stood as Labour candidate, it was not going to be Mr Livingstone. Cheated of the nomination in a questionable selection process, Mr Livingstone ran as an independent and stormed home. Later, he made peace with the Labour Party, and it may have been the party's unpopularity rather than his own than finally finished him. The former prime minister was by no means the only person to try to block Mr Livingstone's political career. The political use that he made of the office of leader of the GLC irritated Margaret Thatcher so much that she abolished the council. Tabloid newspapers also set out to destroy him. Early in the 1980s, The Sun ran Mr Livingstone's photograph under the headline "The Most Odious Man in Britain." This year, the Evening Standard, London's main newspaper, campaigned relentlessly, day in and day out, to bring Mr Livingstone down. Channel Four joined in, with an hour-long denunciation. This unending chorus of antagonism obscured Livingstone's considerable ability to make things happen. It is unlikely that any other politician would have taken the risk of offending car owners by introducing the congestion charge. In his first incarnation as GLC leader, he was accused of being anti-police, but as Mayor he backed the head of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Ian Blair, through every controversy. On Mr Livingstone's watch, London's crime figures fell five years in succession. He also negotiated £16bn funding for Crossrail, which will be one of the biggest developments in public transport in the world, and played a central role in securing London's bid for the 2012 Olympics. Conceding victory to Mr Johnson at City Hall last night, an emotional Ken Livingstone apologised to the senior and junior members of the Labour Party who helped him fight his campaign, saying he accepted full responsibility for the defeat. He also paid tribute to London, calling it "the greatest city of the 21st Century". He said: "I want to thank Londoners for allowing me for eight years to serve as your Mayor – it has been the most amazing experience. I really give you my assurance I'll do all I can to help the new administration in any way it seeks. But in whatever role, I will continue whilst I live and breathe to live in this city, to love this city, and to work to make it better." See also Ken Livingstone - London's Mayor Boris Johnson is 'formidable', says Ken Livingstone Readers
please email comments to: editorial AT
martinfrost.ws including full name
|
||
| Note: martinfrost.ws contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner. | ||
| meditations |
top |
|