Robbie the Pict -- strikes
This week Robbie releases a copy letter from the Crown Office which demonstrably proves the Skye Bridge con. Robbie's press release is here
Scottish
Peoples Mission
Old Schoolyard, DUNVEGAN, Isle of Skye, Scotland
Tel: +44 (0) 1470 521 550/E-mail: spm@pictland.freeserve.co.uk
Press Release – 9 January 2005 - EMBARGO – 0001hrs Tuesday – Thanks
FABRICATION OF TOLL EVIDENCE PROVED DELIBERATE!
F.O.I. LETTER SHOWS CROWN KNEW OF INCOMPLETE LICENCE
Old Schoolyard, DUNVEGAN, Isle of Skye, Scotland
Tel: +44 (0) 1470 521 550/E-mail: spm@pictland.freeserve.co.uk
Press Release – 9 January 2005 - EMBARGO – 0001hrs Tuesday – Thanks
FABRICATION OF TOLL EVIDENCE PROVED DELIBERATE!
F.O.I. LETTER SHOWS CROWN KNEW OF INCOMPLETE LICENCE
Following last week’s dramatic revelations by the former PF at Dingwall, David Hingston, essentially admitting that he was asked to proceed with criminal prosecutions based on a selection of clippings and cuttings, this office now wishes to make public the text of a letter from 27 November 1995, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act 2001.
Mr Hingston had written to the Crown Office first asking whether this might be best treated as a civil matter, but was told to develop criminal proceedings against protesters using the Sheriff Court in Dingwall. He then inquired about what paperwork should be used to ‘prove’ the legality of the regime. A confused Crown Office wrote back suggesting that it might be better to use the pages of civil contracts, saying of the statutory identification statement, publicising the assignation of ministerial rights:
“The
Assignation Statement does not appear to be a final document –
it does not even state the date of the Toll Order.”
[Neil McFadyen, Deputy Crown Agent, to Procurator Fiscal at Dingwall.]
it does not even state the date of the Toll Order.”
[Neil McFadyen, Deputy Crown Agent, to Procurator Fiscal at Dingwall.]
This tolling licence, the statutory counterpart to the civil arrangement by private contract, is required by law. It is the cornerstone of legitimacy or prosecutions for refusal. Without being in possession of this document, proving entitlement to ministerial rights, any person demanding tolls does not have the necessary statutory identification papers, proof of authority to charge, and
COMMITS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE
[Section 37(4)(a), New Roads and Street Works Act 1991].
[Section 37(4)(a), New Roads and Street Works Act 1991].
However that offence only attracts a maximum fine of £1000 for every toll demanded.
The offence of premeditated perjury, fabrication of documentary evidence for presentation to a Court of Law, is classed as a felony.
[Documentary Evidence Act of 1878 - minimum 7 years hard labour in the colonies.]
Crown Production 16, the cut and pasted ‘Secretary of State’s Consent’ memo, passed off first to Mr Hingston and then to a blind or educationally sub-normal Sheriff James Fraser, was a clear perversion of the course of justice. A slightly smarter Lord Eassie says of it:
“the
execution of the memorandum did not constitute an expression of consent
in writing” (Robbie the Pict v. Miller Civil Engineering 3 March 1999).
Send us a puffin post-card from the Falklands, Lord James!